Skip to content
  • 0 Unread 0
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Plutonium

  1. Home
  2. BO2 Client Support
  3. Steam Deck Patch

Steam Deck Patch

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved BO2 Client Support
23 Posts 12 Posters 11.2k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Xerxesundefined Xerxes

    Everything not mentioned in the system requirements is not supported and does not get tested. Hence why it can break at any time. We are not a tripple (or quadruple 😂 ) A studio / publisher that can afford 200 different test set-ups. The issue also lies somewhere in between since wine simply returns garbage for a lot of values.

    Black Lamentundefined Offline
    Black Lamentundefined Offline
    Black Lament
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Xerxes Moron, Plutonium runs fine. The problem is you banning random people with flawed Anti-Cheat, and the OFFICIAL ADVICE FOR DEALING WITH IT (until it got deleted? Been a while.) was to SPOOF MY HARDWARE AND BYPASS THE BAN. Massive lol.

    WolflexZundefined Astroculeundefined 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • Black Lamentundefined Black Lament

      Xerxes Moron, Plutonium runs fine. The problem is you banning random people with flawed Anti-Cheat, and the OFFICIAL ADVICE FOR DEALING WITH IT (until it got deleted? Been a while.) was to SPOOF MY HARDWARE AND BYPASS THE BAN. Massive lol.

      WolflexZundefined Offline
      WolflexZundefined Offline
      WolflexZ
      Contributor
      wrote on last edited by WolflexZ
      #11

      Black Lament Plutonium is a free project, so they don't really have to do your bidding. Almost most of the bans are done by the anticheat. People not reading the anticheat or not researching thoroughly. The reason why Steam Decks are getting banned is because they have similar hardware/hwid. Someone decided to cheat on the steam deck, which ruined the experience for others. I don't think they'll be lifting it anytime soon as it's a security/cheater risk. So, technically this isn't the plutonium team fault but the community or that person fault who decided to cheat on a steam deck.
      In short, steam decks works fine but isn't technically supported, however someone decided to cheat and ruin the experience for other steam deck players.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Black Lamentundefined Black Lament

        Xerxes Moron, Plutonium runs fine. The problem is you banning random people with flawed Anti-Cheat, and the OFFICIAL ADVICE FOR DEALING WITH IT (until it got deleted? Been a while.) was to SPOOF MY HARDWARE AND BYPASS THE BAN. Massive lol.

        Astroculeundefined Offline
        Astroculeundefined Offline
        Astrocule
        Contributor
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Black Lament The Anti-Cheat may be flawed in its sense of compatibility with the steam-deck. But you need to keep in mind, this is an in-house Anti-Cheat. They made it themselves, and it had came before the steam-deck was even remotely popular among the tech community. So there was never expectations for it to not be supported by HWID misconfiguration.

        As disappointing as it is to not be able to play projects like this because of these reasons, it is within understanding since they are a very small team. When larger company's (ones like Larian-Studios, Take-Two, Pearl Abyss etc) even struggle with general Linux compatibility, I wouldn't imagine it to be a feasible task for Plutonium on-top of any roadmap they have most likely been planning out at the moment.

        There has always been talk of supporting the steam-deck, maybe one day Eldor will flip a switch and decide to start working on the AC for compatibility, and maybe he never will. Regardless acting like this doesn't help, I personally wouldn't want to add support to a community that acts self entitled. No one in Plutonium is telling you to install a whole new OS to play, it is just simply that they are only able to guarantee (as said by Xerxes) support on the hardware they can test it on effectively. Also as he said, Wine is always changing, it's still missing A TON of Windows Calls, Hooks, userbehavior, not to mention general differences in user/sys space.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • Journeys3ndundefined Offline
          Journeys3ndundefined Offline
          Journeys3nd
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Its been how long, 3 years? And yall refuse to do anything about it? i understand to an extent after going through a bunch of different threads and shit, but the launcher works on the oled model just fine due to diff hwid. have you had any hackers since then? and if so why does the oled model work? I get yall are a community ran project, and i absolutely love what yall have done for these games, but why not try and do something about your anitcheat so all steam deck users can enjoy their classics in the safest way? and lets be honest, what are the odds of somebody trying to hack the game or whatver happened that caused this ban, happeing again. and if so hardware ban the guy. fix the anticheat.

          DirkRockfaceundefined 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • Journeys3ndundefined Journeys3nd

            Its been how long, 3 years? And yall refuse to do anything about it? i understand to an extent after going through a bunch of different threads and shit, but the launcher works on the oled model just fine due to diff hwid. have you had any hackers since then? and if so why does the oled model work? I get yall are a community ran project, and i absolutely love what yall have done for these games, but why not try and do something about your anitcheat so all steam deck users can enjoy their classics in the safest way? and lets be honest, what are the odds of somebody trying to hack the game or whatver happened that caused this ban, happeing again. and if so hardware ban the guy. fix the anticheat.

            DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
            DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
            DirkRockface
            Contributor
            wrote on last edited by DirkRockface
            #14

            Journeys3nd said in Steam Deck Patch:

            what are the odds of somebody trying to hack the game or whatver happened that caused this ban, happeing again.

            100,000 to 1 odds!!!

            i would bet a month's paycheck that within 1 day of unbanning it, it would be banned again.

            Journeys3ndundefined 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • DirkRockfaceundefined DirkRockface

              Journeys3nd said in Steam Deck Patch:

              what are the odds of somebody trying to hack the game or whatver happened that caused this ban, happeing again.

              100,000 to 1 odds!!!

              i would bet a month's paycheck that within 1 day of unbanning it, it would be banned again.

              Journeys3ndundefined Offline
              Journeys3ndundefined Offline
              Journeys3nd
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              DirkRockface okay well let's look at the iw4x client (I think thats what its called). I am able to play that on the deck, no problem. So whats the difference? Why should deck users be punished for one bad actor? Its the fact that they use a flawed anti cheat system. Instead of banning every steam deck user from playing just ban that person specifically. I believe its just pure laziness.

              DirkRockfaceundefined 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Journeys3ndundefined Journeys3nd

                DirkRockface okay well let's look at the iw4x client (I think thats what its called). I am able to play that on the deck, no problem. So whats the difference? Why should deck users be punished for one bad actor? Its the fact that they use a flawed anti cheat system. Instead of banning every steam deck user from playing just ban that person specifically. I believe its just pure laziness.

                DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
                DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
                DirkRockface
                Contributor
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Journeys3nd oh i'm not arguing why it is the way it is, i was just answering your question about what the odds are that it would happen again...

                Journeys3ndundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • DirkRockfaceundefined DirkRockface

                  Journeys3nd oh i'm not arguing why it is the way it is, i was just answering your question about what the odds are that it would happen again...

                  Journeys3ndundefined Offline
                  Journeys3ndundefined Offline
                  Journeys3nd
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  DirkRockface my fault lol. Misread it. But might as well get that info out there for moderators to see.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • DanHolliundefined Offline
                    DanHolliundefined Offline
                    DanHolli
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    My friend was running on a SteamDeck and was hit with this and... wow... just wow. IDK if he's permanently banned because of this or what, but if you know there's a problem with HWID's being the same, in the AC you make, and you refuse to solve the issue, why would you not preemptively warn that you can't run it?

                    DirkRockfaceundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • DanHolliundefined DanHolli

                      My friend was running on a SteamDeck and was hit with this and... wow... just wow. IDK if he's permanently banned because of this or what, but if you know there's a problem with HWID's being the same, in the AC you make, and you refuse to solve the issue, why would you not preemptively warn that you can't run it?

                      DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
                      DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
                      DirkRockface
                      Contributor
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      DanHolli said in Steam Deck Patch:

                      why would you not preemptively warn that you can't run it?

                      For the same reason that they don't preemptively warn that plutonium can't run on a toaster... or a raspberry pi.

                      There are lots of non-officially supported ways to get plutonium running on different platforms / Operation Systems but you won't find warnings or guides on the official site about those because they don't support those. You WILL find guides and warnings (like it not working on SteamDeck) on the forums... a quick little search before hand would have easily pointed that out 😉

                      Plutonium officially supports windows and sticks to talking about that on it's official site/install guides.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Lyn_undefined Offline
                        Lyn_undefined Offline
                        Lyn_
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        Please fix this if at all possible. The Steam Deck is very popular and one of the only console-like experiences on PC. The Steam Machine will be releasing soon and the next generation of Xbox is extremely likely to be a PC-hybrid of some sort so hardware bans for these don't make a lot of sense. There is no other way to safely play BO2 multiplayer anymore, it sucks to be blocked off from it entirely because of bad actors that.

                        I also hope the extremely entitled, obnoxious people in this thread hurling insults at free contributors didn't affect any decisions, they do not speak for Deck users whatsoever.

                        I also have to disagree with the post directly above me. I don't think the Steam Deck is comparable to random hardware and it's popular enough that there would be no reason for someone to assume it wouldn't work when Linux in general does. Especially when this is not a compatibility issue.

                        DirkRockfaceundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Lyn_undefined Lyn_

                          Please fix this if at all possible. The Steam Deck is very popular and one of the only console-like experiences on PC. The Steam Machine will be releasing soon and the next generation of Xbox is extremely likely to be a PC-hybrid of some sort so hardware bans for these don't make a lot of sense. There is no other way to safely play BO2 multiplayer anymore, it sucks to be blocked off from it entirely because of bad actors that.

                          I also hope the extremely entitled, obnoxious people in this thread hurling insults at free contributors didn't affect any decisions, they do not speak for Deck users whatsoever.

                          I also have to disagree with the post directly above me. I don't think the Steam Deck is comparable to random hardware and it's popular enough that there would be no reason for someone to assume it wouldn't work when Linux in general does. Especially when this is not a compatibility issue.

                          DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
                          DirkRockfaceundefined Offline
                          DirkRockface
                          Contributor
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          Lyn_ if you disagree with the post above you then you should re read what i said.

                          It is a FACT that plutonium was designed to run on windows. The fact that it works on some linux setups is GREAT! but not the point of the project.

                          If plutonium running on linux was the point of the project, then it would be designed so that the anti cheat didn't conflict with the way HWID works on the older steam decks.

                          This is a compatibility issue... that's the point! It was never created to run on linux/steam decks. Just because it CAN be made to work on some setups does not mean that the dev team needs to put in extra work to make it work on all of them.

                          I got nothing against the steam deck... i hate too that it doesn't work on it, i'm just saying there are TONS of popular platforms / gaming machines that plutonium will not work on either because it is not what the project is intended for.

                          Lyn_undefined 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • spamhater6undefined Offline
                            spamhater6undefined Offline
                            spamhater6
                            wrote last edited by spamhater6
                            #22

                            I FOUND A WORKAROUND WITH CLAUDE FOR THE STEAMDECK. here you go-

                            First run this command in terminal:
                            cat > /home/deck/dxvk_spoof.conf << 'EOF'
                            dxgi.customVendorId = 1002
                            dxgi.customDeviceId = 687F
                            dxgi.customDeviceDesc = AMD Radeon RX 580 Series
                            EOF

                            Then run this:
                            DXVK_CONFIG_FILE=/home/deck/dxvk_spoof.conf

                            at this point I am assuming you have added the plutonium.exe as a nonsteam shortcut in steam, so after that add this launch parameters DXVK_CONFIG_FILE=/home/deck/dxvk_spoof.conf %command%

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • DirkRockfaceundefined DirkRockface

                              Lyn_ if you disagree with the post above you then you should re read what i said.

                              It is a FACT that plutonium was designed to run on windows. The fact that it works on some linux setups is GREAT! but not the point of the project.

                              If plutonium running on linux was the point of the project, then it would be designed so that the anti cheat didn't conflict with the way HWID works on the older steam decks.

                              This is a compatibility issue... that's the point! It was never created to run on linux/steam decks. Just because it CAN be made to work on some setups does not mean that the dev team needs to put in extra work to make it work on all of them.

                              I got nothing against the steam deck... i hate too that it doesn't work on it, i'm just saying there are TONS of popular platforms / gaming machines that plutonium will not work on either because it is not what the project is intended for.

                              Lyn_undefined Offline
                              Lyn_undefined Offline
                              Lyn_
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              spamhater6 I haven't had a chance to test this out yet but you're a hero for this.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Unread 0
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups