T7.
-
-
Plutonium isn't about playing for free, it's about adding features and enhancements to old games
-
BO3 already has most, if not all, things plutonium would be adding
-
A Plutonium client for BO3 wouldn't make it suddenly get more players
@Dr-Stone762 said in T7.:
I think I would like to see bo1 or even aw more than bo3 because they are games that I have not played in 2 generations of consoles (ps3), I would like the plutonium team to support one of those 2, I personally loved it that plutonium gave me the opportunity to replay the great and nostalgic bo2
bo3 < bo1/aw
for nostalgia
BO1 (T5) has already been announced. Theres no ETA, but it is being worked on.
-
-
BO3 would probably just make your BO 2 client lose players, when people start hearing that they can play bo 3 again normally and for free, believe thats gonna get you masses of players
-
BO3 would probably just make your BO 2 client lose players, when people start hearing that they can play bo 3 again normally and for free, believe thats gonna get you masses of players
NotAmeL Plus theres Copyright Pluto Would 100% have to worry about since theres nothing being Changed about it making such a thing is ages more Dangerous as cool as having BO3 Pluto theres Not much to Improve on so if you want to play BO3 Buy it It has players and a community
-
NotAmeL Plus theres Copyright Pluto Would 100% have to worry about since theres nothing being Changed about it making such a thing is ages more Dangerous as cool as having BO3 Pluto theres Not much to Improve on so if you want to play BO3 Buy it It has players and a community
Memeking254
As i said in a post up there, i already play bo 3 from time to time, my friend is family sharing it to me on steam whenever i want, i don't want to buy it because it's not worth it 7 years later, but the game is just dead, zombies still have players sometimes , multiplayer is dead, custom games are screwed. -
You also forget that if someone works on BO3 (which is useless) they'll have a very high chance of getting sued. They still get a lot of money from BO3.
I bought it for 25$ with the zombies edition and honestly with the workshop support it's a fair price.
Just wait for a sale or don't play it. As for the cheaters that's the only part I agree this is sad.All the rest wouldn't be fixed by creating a client for it and I doubt Plutonium would spend months working on it "just" to add an anti cheat to a game.
-
I think I would like to see bo1 or even aw more than bo3 because they are games that I have not played in 2 generations of consoles (ps3), I would like the plutonium team to support one of those 2, I personally loved it that plutonium gave me the opportunity to replay the great and nostalgic bo2
bo3 < bo1/aw
for nostalgia@Dr-Stone762 Aw would be cool, but we already have s1x. Bo1 would be cool as well, but they are already developing that. I feel that once Bo1 is done, Bo3 would be the perfect experience to be brought to plutonium. Bo3 is in my opinion (and a lot of other people's opinions as well) the best zombies and multiplayer experience we ever got in a Call of Duty. I believe Bo3 would be perfect for plutonium.
-
I think BO3 on Plutonium would blow up the client within a week
-
xIAMZAK what exactly would 'blow up' mean? Good or bad way?
-
#1 topic of the meeting between activision/microsoft and their lawyers.
-
T7 is by far the most popular CoD game on Steam which is ultimately what matters - not necessarily when the game was released. As far as we can tell we're fine and stay under the radar working on the games we currently support/have in the pipeline, but T7 specifically would almost certainly get the papers flying at a certain law firm.
