Bring Black ops 3 to Plutonium
-
we have not said we need to wait 3-5 years there is no reason for a bo3 client to exist.
it has players most of which plays zombies. it has steam workshop support for mods and mod downloading and it allows players to run there own server. there is nothing for us to add to the game to improve it
-
Yeah, fr. I'd love to see custom maps and shit in Plutonium, glad they're adding black ops 1 though
-
@Taruzu The point is BO3 already has custom maps and works perfectly fine.
If you want free games then you're at the wrong place -
Resxt Black ops 3 is notorious for its trickshotting community as well not just zombies.
-
Resxt lol no the game is dead i have the game and all its dlcs
-
@Taruzu the game is not dead , unless the servers are offline and cant access the files . you bought the game start your own server
-
according to steam charts bo3 is just fine just because the mp is dead does not mean the game is dead usually just means no one wants to play mp, we are here for a trickshot community we are here to improve games like giving mod support and fast dl to modern warfare 3 and waw t4 zm dedicated servers along with mod downloading we strive to improve game play and the general modability of the games bo3 has mod downloading, the steam workshop and players can host their own servers even if there unranked people can still host there own mp servers.
https://steamcharts.com/app/311210
-
FragsAreUs BO3 Servers are integrated into private match, meaning all the servers on the list are people who wanna play a private game without randoms joining, completely defeating the purpose of public servers. To make things worse, the multiplayer section of the server list is completely empty, making you use matchmaking which only ever has 1 lobby at a time.
I understand if y'all don't wanna touch BO3 because of the risk of Activision shutting down plutonium, but you'd be lying to yourselves if you think y'all can't fix BO3 or make it better.
-
FragsAreUs That's the problem, nobody is willing to have a server running for multiplayer or zombies, just because the functionality is there doesn't mean people will use it- meanwhile BO3 would be flooded with servers if it was integrated into plutonium.
-
Everyone keeps going on about it, fuck BO3. If Bo3 is really that bad I think someone would have a client for BO3.
Stop trying to get the game for free x
-
Bossman what you don't understand is that Plutonium is not gonna work for months on a game on their free time just to fix a game.
The devs do it as a passion, they like to bring games to the next level with modding, dedicated servers and all that.Fixing a game that a billion dollar company abandoned just to get sued after is not fun
-
Bossman you should understand that they’re doing these types of projects for free. You should just be happy with what you got for now. You could donate them to contribute to the project. You’ll just have to wait and see till they decide what they’ll do. They ain’t trying to get cease and demand letter on them or else they’ll have to take everything down and you’ll get nothing in return.
-
WolflexZ I really hate how just because I question some decisions it automatically means I don't appreciate them making all these games 100x better, but I'm sorry if my replies came off like that. As for donating, I'm planning on donating once I graduate and stuff.
-
Resxt With all due respect, It seems like plutonium could get taken down by Activision at anytime regardless If you work on BO3 or not- y'all allow people to play their games for free and even show people how to torrent them. Which now that I think about it, BO3 probably would kill Plutonium, but mainly because people would instantly start pirating the game and not because you're adding servers.
I'm gonna drop this, I know this subject is annoying for y'all and I don't wanna come off as an asshole or unappreciative, I really love this project and I just thought BO3 would be a cool update for it, but I understand why y'all can't. Looking forward to BO1 though!
-
Bossman Black Ops III is 7 years old, the most recent Plutonium game, Black Ops II, is 10 years old so it's not the same.
BO3 is still supported and still gets Activision a lot of money.
Expensive price, expensive DLCs even if you buy the zombie edition you have to buy 8$ maps, black market, lootboxes and other things that bring cash.On other CODs we support there's no reason to buy DLCs on Steam unless you wanna play BO2 zombies maps and there's no lootbox or stuff that makes money so no, it's clearly not the same.
Also BO3 has way more players than the games we support so no it's really not the same.We know what we're talking about, it's not an excuse.
It's just facts, not an opinion -
Resxt ... Which is why I said in my reply that the whole point y'all would be taken down is because you encourage people to pirate their stuff and Activision would loss money over that. The only reason why BO3 can't be on plutonium is because of the poor decision to allow people to use pirated versions of the games on plutonium, literally circumventing piracy, that's facts.
-
Bossman seriously though, I can already tell this might turn into an argument so this is my last reply. Hopefully no animosity was created.
-
I am going to be locking this for now, at the end of the this is a passion project and we will decide what we work on and how we go about it unlike the other cods we support bo3 has already in place what we have added to the cods we are working on dedi's mod support and fast dl in the case of mw3 and t4 zm -note that t4 zm never had dedicated servers and it was all p2p and never had mod downloaded so on steam in order to play with friends you all had to download the same map first instead of joining a server and having the map download for you like in the case of bo3 since that is handled by the steam workshop.
we will always recommend people to buy the game, but there are a lot of entitled people out there who will refuse and only play on our platform because we don't enforce a ownership check on stuff like steam even if bo3 is ever on sale there is a lot of people who would still think 20 usd to "Too Much" and it should be free or even lower years later. Especially the entitled people don't care what we offer as a to these old games to bring the mod ability to the player that frankly this day in age got left behind when cod used to be a pc first before it became a pc 2nd console first mentality an the once mod friendly cod disappeared until mostly bo3 with they give that ability back after the games life cycle was over with. Minds might change in the future like it has for bo1 but as of right now we have zero interest on working on bo3.
