Plutonium Verification Form
-
im againts it cuz i want to keep playing with my friends like the old days its a 11 year old plus games yall
-
I get it. Pluto is for keeping the games safe, not piracy. What most don't consider is that countries outside of America exist (Crazy, I know). As an Egyptian I do not think it's fair that my mother works as a pharmacist (aka got through hell in school) And has a good job only for a game from 2012 to cost half our monthly salary. For teachers here that's more than the monthly salary. If people wanted they could just buy the game on steam but for African gamers (and people in places with generally weak currencies) it's not fair at all
Besides, Activision will Cease and Desist this as they like
No matter if it has ownership verification or not since it's stealing players form their money cowns
We kinda scared the shit out of them when they killed SM2 and Xlabs so I don't think they have the balls to touch plutoMostafa_XS1 I think your assessment is pretty spot on, well said
-
Mostafa_XS1 I think your assessment is pretty spot on, well said
InTrance Thanks! It's not really an assessment it's what's going on outside of America and Europe
-
InTrance Thanks! It's not really an assessment it's what's going on outside of America and Europe
Mostafa_XS1 I hear ya man, i meant your assessment of the c&d situation and how acti would do it anyways ^^
-
im chillin
-
i am againts that i love the Game but 800 Mexican pesos for a 11 years old game that suck
-
If old COD games were actually reasonably priced, I think most people wouldn't mind the verification, but there is no reason for an unsupported game that is many years old to be 60 dollars, even 20 bucks on sale is a steep ask especially since the DLC is still full price (Activision moment).
-
If old COD games were actually reasonably priced, I think most people wouldn't mind the verification, but there is no reason for an unsupported game that is many years old to be 60 dollars, even 20 bucks on sale is a steep ask especially since the DLC is still full price (Activision moment).
CEOofBadPlayers said in Plutonium Verification Form:
even 20 bucks on sale is a steep ask especially since the DLC is still full price
Maybe you should read the actual announcement first before you start to rant?
-
CEOofBadPlayers said in Plutonium Verification Form:
even 20 bucks on sale is a steep ask especially since the DLC is still full price
Maybe you should read the actual announcement first before you start to rant?
Xerxes Plutonium not checking for DLC ownership gives Activision a good enough reason to potentially give it a C&D.
-
imo this is really silly, AAA publishers have continually shown that if they want a mod taken down they WILL C&D it regardless of the legality (ie: rockstar, activision, nintendo). removing torrents off the site was a good move though and should've been done years ago, I have no idea how pluto did that for so long without activision taking action
additionally, the plutonium dev team really seems to underestimate just how many of their players are pirating lmao. if they go forward with this change plutonium is going to lose a lot of it's players and alternative clients will likely eventually pop up that don't care about ownership status
-
iwtr-nny imagine being racist on plutonium forums. Most cringe thing i have seen in a while.
-
Will this vote actually have an effect on pluto getting verification?
-
no it wont
-
Damn.
-
CEOofBadPlayers said in Plutonium Verification Form:
even 20 bucks on sale is a steep ask especially since the DLC is still full price
Maybe you should read the actual announcement first before you start to rant?
Xerxes He didn't rant just stated his thoughts. Is that not wanted anymore i guess??
-
Xerxes He didn't rant just stated his thoughts. Is that not wanted anymore i guess??
English :
It is truly disheartening that the situation has reached this point. I find it difficult to believe that any rectification can effectively occur. For five years, as previously mentioned by a colleague, everything was accessible without constraints. Then, abruptly, due to XLabs receiving a cease and desist notice, the Plutonium project had to respond. While it is necessary to establish proper protocols, should Activision choose to take action against Plutonium, they possess the capability to do so effortlessly. This is contingent upon the game being both free and in violation of regulations for an extended period. Personally, I had to acquire the game today, as an owner of five BOII servers. Despite the cost being 25€, it remains a substantial amount that may be beyond the means of certain individuals, such as young gamers or parents facing financial hardship towards the month's end. In my view, implementing an audit could potentially lead to a decline in the Plutonium player base, consequently pushing them towards failure.
Français :
Il est vraiment décourageant que la situation en soit arrivée à ce point. J'ai du mal à croire qu'une rectification puisse effectivement avoir lieu. Pendant cinq ans, comme l'a dit un collègue, tout était accessible sans contrainte. Puis, brusquement, XLabs ayant reçu un avis de cessation et d'abstention, le projet Plutonium a dû réagir. Bien qu'il soit nécessaire d'établir des protocoles appropriés, si Activision décide de prendre des mesures à l'encontre de Plutonium, ils ont la capacité de le faire sans effort. Pour cela, il faut que le jeu soit à la fois gratuit et en violation des règles pendant une période prolongée. Personnellement, j'ai dû acquérir le jeu aujourd'hui, en tant que propriétaire de cinq serveurs BOII. Malgré un coût de 25€, cela reste une somme importante qui peut être hors de portée de certaines personnes, comme les jeunes joueurs ou les parents qui ont des difficultés financières en fin de mois. Selon moi, la mise en place d'un audit pourrait potentiellement conduire à une diminution de la base de joueurs de Plutonium, les poussant ainsi vers l'échec. -
This post is deleted!
