Plutonium

gaga53 Maybe you shouldn't make racist comments

@AmadeusWolf You can use IW4MAdmin along with the Yet Another Discord Bridge Plugin created by Xerxes, and can view the chat from your own discord server.

Tixserek BO3 is definitely still supported by Activision. So I'm pretty sure if there was a Plutonium T7, they'd get a cease and desist order... Which would probably apply to the whole project. Not just T7. (This has been discussed by staff multiple times on other threads)

Doesn't seem like a great idea.

What is the issue with buying BO3? The servers aren't broken & the anticheat works on that game... I have a feeling that you and a majority of players just want a Pluto T7 to get the game for free...

El Panadero check here

@Thecodzombiesgod https://forum.plutonium.pw/topic/10/tutorial-loading-custom-gsc-scripts
If you read all the tutorials and directions that you've been linked already, you'd be able to figure this out...

It's nobody's job to hold your hand through the process. Many players have figured it out without any problems.
All the needed directions have already been linked to you.

Pistakilla said in i can't login on plutonium:

I wonder......

version If you are talking about the main menu screens for mp/zm, you can definitely change them in the same way you would with any other custom texture.
In my All-In-One Retexture Pack, I changed both main menu screens. Although I don't recall the exact file names for the menu screens, you can take a look in the pack to see for some of the files.

If you are talking about the server browser UI, that cannot be changed.

@Thecodzombiesgod Read This First, Then follow the directions found on the github....
This isn't rocket science and there's a big part that says DIRECTIONS

xTatsumi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXUDc6zyCx0

Codgogo_ Check here

HighResolution Playing custom games on the difficulty easy can cause "EXE_CLIENT_FIELD_MISMATCH". Try playing on Normal to see if that would fix it

Tupac The mod is open source and can be found here.
The issue that Origins has is that the perks and mystery box are powered by the generators within the map. For this to be a "Survival" experience, we wanted to disable the generators entirely and force the mystery boxes to be accessible anyway. (Got the perks to be powered without generators in the code, but no mystery boxes at all).
Plus we never got to adding the invisible barriers, wallbuys, and we didnt disable certain doors to disable access to certain areas.
And testing with what we had already, the Crazy Place map wouldn't really work because of the spawns for certain zones. It would be extremely easy to camp 1 spot and not die...
If someone wanted to try to fix up the missing parts -- they could. but it takes a fair amount of gamescript knowledge to be able to complete these things. I don't expect it to be completed personally... I lost interest in Origins specifically because we already had so many issues with MoTD that took quite awhile to address and fix. All of the devs within the project put multiple hours into the project to get it to it's current state. Took over a month to complete the Tranzit and MoTD maps. Quite draining to work on the same project for that long with no incentive to continue

MrTmax said in COD BO 2 | Cheater friendly servers disabling codcaster:

More and more cheaters are destroying plututonium

Within only some weeks I have a big collection (capture videos) of cheating noobs.

I think you are underestimating the cheater problem.

Can you provide these videos? Otherwise there is no evidence and these players who might be hacking could continue to ruin games.

In hindsight, there are plenty of good players on the Plutonium servers and I see inaccurate hackusations all the time. I was literally called out yesterday for using wallhacks on IW5 because I pubstomped 1 game. Maybe you got outplayed

@DragonMaverick Link still works
https://github.com/Paintball/BO2-GSC-Releases/tree/master/Zombies Mods/Zombies%2B%2B v1.2

Deagle I'm gonna have to disagree. On games like CoD4, MW2, & MW3 there's a lot less variety between player's choices for guns, attachments, and perks.
Because you're forced to pick a perk for each perk slot on those games, most players end up with similar loadouts.

BO2 allowed for a lot more variety because you could decide to only run 2 perks in order to add an extra attachment. Or sacrificing your tacticals and lethals for extra perks.

I honestly feel like it's the BEST system since you're not limited to your primary gun, 1 gun attachment, pistol/launcher/shotgun secondary, 3 perks, a tactical grenade, & a lethal grenade.

Fire Ice Follow the directions

Kitchen Gun Now I'm not staff, but I'd imagine the amount of work required wouldn't be worth it because of the tiny playercount for these games. Sure they may have had 12,000+ online at one point in time, but that day is not today.

Advanced Warfare's player base is so small compared to the Call Of Duty games supported by Plutonium.
We're talking less than 100 unique players on AW at any given point. (now we also have to assume not all those players will switch to Plutonium)

If you compare Black Ops 2, there's 500 unique players on the Steam version as I'm writing this post. None of these players are on Plutonium and T6 Plutonium has been available for quite awhile.

Same goes for MW3. Pretty much the same numbers.

And with World at War, there's already more players online than both MW3 and BO2.

Comparatively the value WAW brings to Plutonium is significantly higher than what AW would bring.
AW was just not liked by most Call Of Duty players...

reyalPPlayer No

cheekclaper check here

A7Med_5 You need to load a custom GSC file that you create. Follow this guide to learn more about custom GSC scripts and how to load them for custom games with friends or a dedicated server.